Martin Damm vs Yuta Shimizu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Aug at 11:10 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Damm vs Y. Shimizu

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Damm 1 - 0 Shimizu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin Damm winning 2 and Yuta Shimizu winning 0. The last match between Martin Damm and Yuta Shimizu was at the U.S. Open - New York, 22-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Martin Damm getting the victory 7-6(10) 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Damm | 1 |
Shimizu | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(Q3) U.S. Open - New York(08-22-25)
M. Damm vs Y. Shimizu H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$261,985 | Career Prize Money | $60,235 |
58.47% (176-125) | Career Total W/L | 62.76% (273-162) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
7 | Titles | 13 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Damm vs Y. Shimizu Match Preview
- How does second serve performance influence match outcomes? Damm has a slight edge with a 47.12% success rate compared to Shimizu's 43.1%, which is significant for match predictions.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Shimizu demonstrates strength, achieving a 49.48% win rate compared to Damm’s 46.13%.
- First serve return performance further distinguishes Shimizu, who wins 29.11% of points, as opposed to Damm’s 21.6%.
- Both players exhibit resilience under pressure, with Damm slightly ahead by saving 55.56% of breakpoints compared to Shimizu's 53.57%.
- Overall performance throughout the year favors Damm, who has won 66.07% of matches, surpassing Shimizu’s 55.93% win rate.
- Regarding surface preference, Shimizu excels on Clay with a 69% win rate, whereas Damm prefers Hard courts with a 65% win rate.
- Damm's lower-tier event performance is superior, winning 81.25% of matches, highlighting success at Futures/ITF $10K tournaments compared to Shimizu's 58.49% at Challengers/ITF > $10K events.
- Examining opponent quality, Shimizu has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 328.53, while Damm's opponents average at 389.2.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Shimizu is more reliable with a 67% win rate, notably higher than Damm’s 35%.
- Shimizu shows proficiency in breaking opponents, converting 36.44% of breakpoints, whereas Damm manages to convert 26.57%.
Editorial Prediction (August 21, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head analysis shows that both players bring unique strengths. Shimizu excels in return games and decisive set scenarios. This advantage is crucial for matches hanging in the balance, offering confidence in clutch situations.
Damm’s overall consistency and recent success in slightly lower-tier events underscore his competitive edge. With better second serve effectiveness and significant win percentages across different surfaces, Damm enters this match as a formidable opponent.
While Shimizu's ability to break serves and return first serves are notable, Damm's broader hard-court success and impressive match-winning history suggest he may hold the upper hand.
Shimizu’s tendency to perform better in pressure situations could influence live betting dynamics, particularly in break point and deciding set scenarios. Nonetheless, based on comprehensive performance data and surface specialization, Damm is the likely favorite to win this tennis match.
Martin Damm vs Yuta Shimizu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Damm vs Y. Shimizu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:38:0 | Avg. Match Time | 1:38:0 |
60% (44/73) | 1st Serve % | 62% (50/81) |
80% (35/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (34/50) |
59% (17/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (17/31) |
40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
37% (30/81) | Return Pts Won % | 29% (21/73) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Damm Recent Matches Played
Y. Shimizu Recent Matches Played

M. Damm vs Y. Shimizu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.47% (176/125) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.76% (273/162) |
57.47% (404/299) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.72% (596/402) |
52.42% (3710/3368) | Games Win/Loss | 53.47% (5020/4368) |
64.52% (100/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.16% (216/126) |
49.41% (42/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.23% (27/12) |
55.74% (34/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.32% (26/21) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
0.82 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
2835 | Aces Total | 1064 |
0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1152 | Total Double Faults | 900 |
1:41:49 | Average Match Time | 1:33:53 |
437.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.04 |
59% (12682/21352) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17537/28355) |
76% (9634/12682) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11882/17537) |
50% (4316/8670) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5429/10818) |
39% (675/1715) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1428/3120) |
36% (7492/20902) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12238/29108) |
50.00% (5/5) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
33.33% (2/4) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
49.06% (52/54) | Challenger W/L | 54.40% (105/88) |
65.91% (116/60) | Futures W/L | 71.37% (162/65) |
58% (170/292) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (259/418) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (6/6) |
54% (83/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (66/121) |
47% (48/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (75/134) |
80% (189/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (259/227) |
20% (189/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (259/31) |
19% (112/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (176/43) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Damm (Columbus Challenger)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
